Talk:Sammy Lee (scientist)

This article was nominated for deletion on 2008-01-24. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biophysics (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biophysics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BiophysicsWikipedia:WikiProject BiophysicsTemplate:WikiProject BiophysicsBiophysics articles

Physiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the field of physiology.

Conflict of interest

There is one main contibutor to this article, and there may be a conflict of interest at work. An expert opinion would be of much use. LeaHazel : talk : contribs 13:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, tone of article sounds very much like a self-contribution. Ham Pastrami (talk) 17:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

memories

It's good to find a Wikipedia article (finally) for Dr Sammy Lee. I do remember how in the early 80's, I used to see him sauntering around the UCL grounds in deep thought. His mind constantly aroused by innovations and ideas for the future of IVF. I do also remember how BK helped Lee with his project and thesis, and there would always be a good game of chess going on in the after hours. 81.154.176.144 20:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

recent article in The Scotsman

After woman aged 67 gives birth to twins, motherhood now beckons for 70-year-olds The Scotsman 01 Jan 2007 THE number of women "cheating nature" to have babies well into old age will become ever more common - and may herald the era of the 70- year-old mother, a fertility expert said yesterday. Dr Sammy Lee said the revelation a Spanish woman had given birth at ...

Should the gift of life have a price tag? The Scotsman 19 Feb 2007 A WOMAN'S eggs are among her most precious gifts - a finite resource uniquely required in the creation of life. However, the issue of what women can do with them takes centre stage this week, when the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) is ... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Artlondon (talk • contribs) 21:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

WPMED assessment

It's reasonable to believe that Sammy Lee is important to his subspecialty. However, in terms of his impact on worldwide medicine, it's pretty much the same as any other individual, which is to say "low." It's impossible to justify a rating that names Sammy Lee as being equal in importance to the World Health Organization or the National Institutes of Health. It might be barely possible to justify a rating of Mid, but I think Sammy Lee's relationship to the goals of the WPMED project is best described as "only included to cover a specific part of a notable article" -- which is the criteria for a "low" importance rating. I encourage you to look at the examples on the actual scale before changing this. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:09, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Sammy Lee (scientist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:51, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sammy Lee (scientist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091008024519/http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/article6843074.ece to http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/article6843074.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:50, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]