Talk:Royal Scots Fusiliers

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Royal Scots Fusiliers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/inf/021RSF.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:56, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

2018 Update

I'm linking to this from other pages so I've updated this and I wanted to include the changes on here (there are a lot :));

The Earl of Mar's Regiment of Foot ('Mar's Grey Breeks') (1678–1695); Dates are wrong - regiments changed names with the Colonel so in 1689 it became O'Farrell's Regiment;

Stuart loyalist Charles Erskine, de jure 5th Earl of Mar; confused with his son, who in any case was a supporter of William until his death in 1702 etc;

...however, when he fled to Ireland, it opted to serve Prince William of Orange; not correct and not what Cannon says.

17:49, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Naming Conventions and Origin of Fusilier

As a former member British Army I know this is a sensitive topic :), so I'm not wedded to a specific answer but...

Naming; as explained in the article, regiments were originally named after their Colonel and names changed when they got a new one; that continued at least until 1710.

In his History, Cannon refers to North British Fusiliers or 21st, rather than Royal Scots or O'Farrell's etc - but this seems to have been a decision that kept it simple because that's not what they were listed as in Army Lists of this period.

Fusilier; Cannon states 1691 as when the regiment became O'Farrell's Fusiliers; the assumption is that it comes from fusil but Fusilier regiments all had an exploding bomb tag (like grenadiers) so it probably relates to grenades not fusil. That would seem to be confirmed by the fact only Fusilier regiments, the Grenadier Guards plus one or two others were later allowed to use the British Grenadiers.

Robinvp11 (talk) 20:08, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the improvements. Dormskirk (talk) 20:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

No worries; I'm only going as far as 1713 as that's my area of focus - Wikipedia editing can be like pulling on a thread :).

Robinvp11 (talk) 07:33, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Add my photo of Churchill with entire regiment at Ploegsteert?

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Churchill_and_Officers_of_6th_Royal_Scots_Fusiliers_WWI.jpg

• Support. I think this would be appropriate here as its focus is the regiment. The cropped version, focusing on Churchill and Sinclair, is suitable for the Churchill article. No Great Shaker (talk) 15:51, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
• Support. Looks good to me. Dormskirk (talk) 16:28, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

What is the source of the original that was scanned?? It would be better without the brown tinting.SovalValtos (talk) 18:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

The original in my grandfather's possession is brown tinted. Samleighton87 (talk) 19:39, 14 July 2020 (UTC)