Talk:Manchester Airport High Speed station

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations / in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Manchester Interchange. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 May 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 19:56, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Manchester Interchange → Manchester Airport High Speed railway station – I haven't seen any evidence of it being called 'Manchester Interchange' and is always referred to as Manchester Airport however to avoid confusion I propose it should be called Manchester Airport High Speed railway station. If anyone can provide evidence it is called Manchester Interchange please provide links or references. The HS2 website also refers to it as Manchester Airport and so does gov.uk and the original hs2 documents. [1][2][3]MainLine45 (talk) 08:34, 15 May 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:55, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't seen any evidence of it being called 'Manchester Airport High Speed' either. We do not speculate: please provide links or references. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 10:17, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Provided evidence MainLine45 (talk) 11:31, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The proposed name makes no sense. "Manchester Airport High Speed" isn't a proper name, but part of a descriptive phrase. I think the nom is unclear on what capitalisation exists for and how it is used. Furthermore, "I haven't seen any evidence of it being called 'Manchester Interchange'" simply indicates that the nom did not actually look; the very first source cited in this article [4] has that exact name written quite large on it. Furthermore, the bulk of the sources are writing in generic descriptive language ("a new station at Manchester airport", "London to Manchester services", "the route from Crewe to Manchester with new stations at Manchester Piccadilly and Manchester Airport", "The staton at Manchester Airport will have ...", "A spur from the main line serves a new station at Manchester Airport", etc.). Zero of them capitalize "high speed" as a descriptor (which should be "high-speed" anyway; WP, like other academic writing, hyphenates compound modifiers). One, a pamphlet about future construction plans, seems to treat the exact phrase "Manchester Airport High Speed Station" as a proper name, so that's a potentially viable article title also. But we would not use it, per WP:CONCISE, if Manchester Interchange gets the job done; both are attested in RS, neither are overwhelmingly frequent (WP:COMMONNAME), so use the short one. Further, that pamphlet cites HS2 Ltd as its only source, but the whitepapers and such we're citing, from the same entity, do not use this long phrase in them at all, so the authors of the pamphlet may have simply made it up on-the-fly (we certainly have no evidence to contrary). Finally, this planned station doesn't exist yet (maybe never will), so there's a potential WP:CRYSTAL issue about this article even being here. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 20:02, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose "I haven't seen any evidence of it being called 'Manchester Interchange'" is enough for me to Oppose, Also opposing per COMMONNAME. –Davey2010^Talk 18:42, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.