Talk:List of Singapore MPs

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Lists of members of parliament in Singapore
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Lists of members of parliament in Singapore

Singapore Low‑importance

	Singapore portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Creating a new article?

Perhaps we should rename this article "Members of the 1st to 10th Parliaments of Singapore", move information concerning the 11th Parliament to "Members of the 11th to 20th Parliaments of Singapore", and make "Members of the Singapore Parliament" (or preferably "Members of the Parliament of Singapore") into a disambiguation page? We're running out of space here. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 18:25, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How about following something similar to List of House members of the 39th Parliament of Canada. This table getting a bit too big to read, maybe we can also use color code to represent NCMP and NMP instead of using words and try to standardize the width of the table, the NCMP text make the cell unneccessary wide.Zuff (talk) 05:50, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, go ahead. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 09:18, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]