Talk:Wisconsin Highway 441

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Roads: State highways / Wisconsin Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Wisconsin
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Merge request

I can't say that I ever heard Highway 441 ever called the "Tri-County Freeway" even though I drive it daily. I do understand why it COULD be called that though. The 2 articles are about the same patch of highway. I believe that they should be merged into one article, and use the more familiar name of Highway 441. Tri-County Freeway should be a redirect to Highway 441 in my humble opinion. Royalbroil^{Talk Contrib} 05:22, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note the conventions of WP:USSH, and the articles should be merged (if it should be, I have no local expertise) to Wisconsin Highway 441. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:24, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am confused by what naming convention was we decided for in Wisconsin is then. The "<" and ">" characters around the word "Wisconsin" ment optionality to me, since that is what the characters are used for in all of my computer programming and networking classes. I DO like the "Wisconsin Highway 441" naming convention, and I would have voted for it over all the other proposed names. How come ALL of the Wisconsin articles were not renamed to this new standard? What is the holdup? I notice that the other states are done. Royalbroil^{Talk Contrib} 13:14, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well sorry. We have had to move over 5K pages, Wisconsin wasn't moved first. Be patient. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 22:28, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My main question was about the exact naming system. I'm glad to hear that I did indeed have it right (or close enough). I wasn't questioning the order of the moves or the speed of the effort. I appreciate all the hard work in directing/guiding/teeth pulling that people like you did to get the state highway systems standardized as much as possible. Wikipedia is better for your efforts! Royalbroil^{Talk Contrib} 23:03, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did the merge, but I did not use the new name since I remember reading at WP:USSH that only approved people could do the renaming, and that if anyone else did it that they would be a blocked. I wasn't interested in being blocked. Royalbroil^{Talk Contrib} 12:57, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Sorry I reacted that way, I wasn't in a good mood. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs)

Polish Connection

I'm curious about the "nickname" As I live in the area I can guarantee that the name "The Polish Connection" has nothing to do with the percentage of Polish residents in the area. I'd be curious as to the source of this particular comment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ckennow (talk • contribs) 21:59, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ckennow: I found http://www.postcrescent.com/story/news/local/2014/06/25/tri-county-freeway-gets-green-light-for-550m-expansion/11374099/ in about 30 seconds. –Fredddie ™ 01:52, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Fredddie: "known locally as the Polish Connection because of its unconventional traffic patterns" This is much more accurate and the article should reflect that. The name being attached to the ethnicity of the locals is pure PC BS. –Ckennow ™

Updated the article to reflect cited source regarding colloquialism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ckennow (talk • contribs) 04:38, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wisconsin Highway 441. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110814222642/http://dot.wisconsin.gov/projects/d3/wis441/need.htm to http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/projects/d3/wis441/need.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:11, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]