Jump to content

Talk:Gulf of St. Lawrence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments

[edit]

Most references I've seen describe the Saint Lawrence Estuary and the Gulf of Saint Lawrence as two different bodies of water, divided by Anticosti Island. See [1] as an example. Can someone local confirm or deny that the Gulf is considered part of the estuary? Kmusser 17:49, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am from "la Gaspésie", and I would believe that this type of division, for a local resident, is highly artificial. Locals call this body of water "la Mer" (the Sea), which generally extends to all the body of salt water in the region, including the Gulf and the Estuary, down to a good distance into the mainland.

Shouldn't the part after Ile Orleans be considered the estuary?

[edit]

That is where the water from the Great Lakes mix with seawater. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sega31098 (talkcontribs) 21:22, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Extent as an estuary

[edit]

There's an unsourced claim in the article that the entire Gulf is an estuary. There's a hydrological definition of the extent of the Gulf qua Gulf, but it's far from clear that that defines it as an estuary. (My own guess is that most of the gulf looks more like marine bay, but I'll defer to any actual sources on this.) 84.203.35.23 (talk) 22:52, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name

[edit]

Should it not be called Saint Lawrence Gulf instead? Many of the web results that say "Gulf of Saint Lawrence" refer to Wikipedia or its mirrors. Results from the federal and provincial governments are mixed. .edu domains show a preference for "of". The English language is silly. - Sweet Nightmares 20:04, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 August 2015

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved, no compelling argument to do so Mike Cline (talk) 18:39, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Gulf of Saint LawrenceGulf of St. Lawrence – Official spelling per Geographical Names Board of Canada http://www4.rncan.gc.ca/search-place-names/search?q=lawrence&category=&province[]=13&sort-field=name G. Timothy Walton (talk) 16:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Image Cleanup

[edit]

Most of the images on this page are excessive duplicates of the same feature and do not correlate with the article. Suggest they be moved to Wikipedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.109.3.4 (talk) 14:10, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gulf of Saint Lawrence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]