Talk:David G. Epstein

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 July 2009. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A different David Epstein

Several anonymous IP editors have attempted to add information about the recently-disgraced Columbia University political science professor David Epstein to this article. I believe the recent news stories refer to David Lester Epstein [1] (someone we do not have an article about, and I would suggest not adding one at this point per WP:NOTSCANDAL). So they have no relevance to the non-Columbia law professor David G. Epstein and should not be added to this article. It's a common enough name that these people seem likely to me to be completely unrelated or only distantly related. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:52, 16 December 2010 (UTC) (Note the variant spelling; I'm also not the one in the news, although I am a Columbia alum.)[reply]

Thank you for this clarification, David Eppstein . I came here also looking for the other David Epstein and was puzzled. Zezen (talk) 08:54, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I could not find any copy of the archive. The only working link I found is Experts on Politics and the Global Economy Available for Comment on Financial Crisis Zezen (talk) 08:56, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on David G. Epstein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090927175842/http://www.law.smu.edu:80/Faculty/Epstein to http://www.law.smu.edu/Faculty/Epstein

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:50, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]