Talk:Committee of American Students of the School of Beaux-Arts, Paris

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Committee of American Students of the School of Beaux-Arts, Paris article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Military history: European / French / North America / United States / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War I task force

To-do

pending... (feel free to add items)

Lx 121 (talk) 13:13, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(re-)find the bibliographical info for that retrospective "best of" book of the postcards; inter-war era, 1920s? Lx 121 (talk) 08:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

find images of more cards Lx 121 (talk) 23:37, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article as it stands is grossly over-illustrated, no more cards pictures are necessary. Encyclopedia-wise, there should only be only depiction of the one style of card backing in the whole article, and there should be considerably less of the various card fronts. A general sampling of these is all that is needed, not every one that can be found on-line. Also, images must be uploaded for use in Wikipedia articles, off-sight links for pictures embedded in the article are not allowed. Hope this helps. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 21:23, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

re: "over-illustrated" - see my comments below. hope this helps.

if that is insufficient, i can provide multiple examples of other "grossly over-illustrated" wikipedia articles for you to "correct". Lx 121 (talk) 13:34, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ADDITIONALLY this item http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/File:Gazette_de_l%27Ecole_des_Beaux-Arts.Octobre,_Novembre,_Decembre_1918.a_partir_du_1er_janvier_1919.pdf is NOT an "offsite link".

please review your actions more carefully when editing? :) Lx 121 (talk) 13:44, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

re: "greatly over-illustrated"

as per the edit comments of a certain user.

the subject of the article is an organisation of ART STUDENTS

which created art postcards

to fundraise for their WW1 CHARITY.

& the artworks created by the organisation are a NOTABLE part of the history.

AND many of the artworks were created by NOTABLE ARTISTS.

additionally, many of the works are NOTABLE as documents of their place & time (france in ww1)

all of which is WHY the organisation is notable enough to merit an article, as part of the HISTORY OF WW1

and

relations between France & the USA

and

ART HISTORY 1910-1920.

so,

how exactly would the user who objects to the article as "over-illustrated", suggest that we COVER this subject?

(also worth noting the objecting editor appears to have no particular expertise or interest in ww1, or art history)

Lx 121 (talk) 13:32, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded at your talk page. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 15:27, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

yes? & your response there says literally NOTHING about the points we are discussing here, OR the article itself. please focus on the subject under discussion? Lx 121 (talk) 17:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Still can't play nice... GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 08:26, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TITLE

"Parisis" (sic) ?