Talk:Clapeyron's theorem
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Clapeyron's theorem (elasticity))
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | On 6 June 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Clapeyron's theorem (elasticity) to Clapeyron's theorem. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 6 June 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 16:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Clapeyron's theorem (elasticity) → Clapeyron's theorem – If this is the WP:PRITOP for "Clapeyron's theorem", then it should be at that title. If it isn't, then Clapeyron's theorem should be converted from a redirect into a disambiguation page. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 21:05, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There is also Clapeyron's Theorem of three moments, and the Clapeyron equation, also known as the Clausius–Clapeyron relation. Polyamorph (talk) 15:06, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support. From my cursory search, it seems that the theorem of three moments is only intermittently described by sources as "Clapeyron's theorem of three moments", whereas this theorem appears to be called "Clapeyron's theorem" exclusively. From this, my impression is that it would follow logically for this theorem to be the primary topic for "Clapeyron's theorem"; a hatnote should suffice for pointing readers to the other topic. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 16:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.