This article was nominated for deletion on June 29, 2018. The result of the discussion was delete.
A fact from Antonio Delgado appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 December 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College basketballWikipedia:WikiProject College basketballTemplate:WikiProject College basketballcollege basketball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
No consensus to move at this time. However, it appears abundantly likely that if this subject continues his career in Congress (and is not 'dead in six months), then a future discussion would likely yield a different result. The case for the primacy of this article would also benefit from continued expansion. bd2412T04:41, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
– With 98% of pageviews for the politician, this seems like an easy primary topic. In fact, the DAB page gets more views than any other topic. Nohomersryan (talk) 19:07, 4 March 2019 (UTC) --Relisting.SITH(talk)10:11, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Too soon. He may be the most viewed now, but six months ago he didn't even rate a page here. Six months from now, who knows? -- Pemilligan (talk) 21:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No indication that the newly-elected American legislator has such all-encompassing international recognition that he overwhelms the combined notability of the other four disambiguation page entries.. —Roman Spinner(talk • contribs)21:45, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The page views may be skewed toward WP:RECENT, but all other objective standards do not point to the sudden emergence of a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Lacking international recognition or legislative achievements, subject is a two-month freshman among 435 representatives, very few if any of whom are dab page primary topics. —Roman Spinner(talk • contribs)18:14, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Roman Spinner, have you looked at the other articles? They're all stubs, save the Philippine ambassador to the Vatican, which is a poor quality article and doubtful to have the same significance as the U.S. legislator already has. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:06, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Muboshgu, if the overriding consideration in the choice of a dab page primary topic was to be comparison with the other entries on that dab page, then every dab page would have a primary topic with the remaining entries lined up in order of views, which may vary on a day-to-day basis. As we all know, however, most dab pages have no primary topic. The choice of primary is usually based upon a relatively high burden of proof with references to levels of national or international notability in various media sources.
While subject certainly has potential for future celebrity, the fact that his entry was not created until four-and-a-half months ago, on October 20, 2018, seventeen days before election day, suggests that, short of becoming an instant luminary in the manner of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, he requires more time to determine whether his primary-topic-worthy potential fame will materialize. —Roman Spinner(talk • contribs)20:11, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above, seems too soon to me. No harm in revisiting this at a later date, and if the page views hold you'll have a stronger case. PC78 (talk) 16:44, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support The page views are clear. Six months ago he didn't rate a page, but six months from now he'll still be in Congress (or be a former member of Congress) and that puts his notability above the others, clearly. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:00, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Is the set of people who are dead incompatible with the set of former members of Congress? We have a few thousand pages to update... JesseRafe (talk) 18:48, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Muboshgu, you mentioned his future status in support of this change when we don't know his future status. No one is arguing that he shouldn't have a page. -- Pemilligan (talk) 19:32, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support The others are significantly more minor political/civic leaders who have been dead for decades (which this Delgado can't match for decades yet despite above), or are minor former athletes. This individual is not only the only currently active one, he is much more prominent figure than any of the other four, and a much stronger candidate for a search in the English encyclopedia. He's a lock to continue to generate the lionshare of future pageviews, given the relevance of U.S. Congressmen compared to... mayors of small towns who never took office. JesseRafe (talk) 18:48, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
– The Lieutenant Governor of New York is the primary topic for the name Antonio Delgado. Even before he was appointed to his current position, he has received significantly more views then others with the same name. If you use the pageviews.wmcloud.org, you will see that the New York politician receives more views which justifies WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. (for technical reasons I can't include the link but you can search all persons with the same name on pageviews.wmcloud.org). cookie monster75506:10, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. There are now multiple routes by which this subject is the clear primary topic of the name, and likely to remain so in an enduring way. BD2412T00:09, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
