Talk:Abhishek Malhan

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 September 2024. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

YouTube Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject YouTube To-do:

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see list.
Assess : Apply the assessment scale on Unknown-importance YouTube articles + Unassessed YouTube articles
Cleanup : See cleanup listing
Maintain : This WikiProject
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class YouTube articles
Other :
- Substitute {{WikiProject YouTube/Invite Members}} on user talk pages
- Check out edit requests on Talk:List of YouTubers

Issues

Hi @Columbidae5, this article doesn't seem to have a NPOV and is slanted towards recent events due to the following reasons-

primarily focuses on Malhan's accomplishments and positive qualities, highlighting his participation in popular reality shows and drawing inspiration from established YouTubers.
usage of positive language to describe Abhishek Malhan, using words like "known" and "emerged".
allegations are mentioned at the end of the article, after establishing a positive image, this minimizes the impact of these claims
the article does not provide much context about Malhan's early career or his work on YouTube before he participated in Bigg Boss OTT and Temptation Island India.
using words like "fandom war" presents the conflict in a way that is relevant to social media.

Leoneix _(talk) 04:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

noted all the issues, working on them. Thanks @Leoneix for highlighting these to create wikipedia a neutral database for readers. Columbidae5 (talk) 10:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Columbidae5 If you wish you can take a look at the articles of other social media personalities for an idea. Reach out to me for any assistance. Leoneix _(talk) 10:28, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Columbidae5 Let me point out another thing. Avoid citing too many sources. See WP:TOOMANYREFS Leoneix _(talk) 15:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay got it, @Leoneix Thank you for helping. Columbidae5 (talk) 16:03, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Columbidae5, You can remove the controversies sections and merge it with the career section per WP:CRITS Leoneix _(talk) 04:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, @Leoneix could you remove the neutrality template from the page now if you think this is not a case now. Columbidae5 (talk) 09:57, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Columbidae5 the article has been significantly improved. A bit more improvement would make it better. Here are few issues that I noticed.

the article claims that Abhishek Malhan is "inspired by Mr. Beast and KSI," but this claim is not cited.
article currently has a lot of references attached, which can make it difficult to read. Consider reducing the number of references by only linking to the most important and relevant articles.

Leoneix _(talk) 10:15, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Leoneix, I have cited the inpiration thing and working on reducing the references. Thank you for guiding me on each step. Columbidae5 (talk) 10:22, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry my bad, I didn't notice it. Leoneix _(talk) 10:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Leoneix can you help me to stop @Ramahare, he is trying to make the article worse. Columbidae5 (talk) 11:54, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Columbidae5, please remove the {{In use}} template that I have added after the completion of your edits. It should not be kept for too long. Leoneix _(talk) 18:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay @Leoneix, understood Columbidae5 (talk) 18:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Career section doesn't seem to have a NPOV anymore. Avoid making useless sub sections, separating the paragraph in parts does the job Leoneix _(talk) 19:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Columbidae5 (talk) 10:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting change in controversies

in the above mentioned controversies, mainly in Lord Ganesha Controversy I request you to add his reply points also as it is half and seems manipulating and creating his image negative in the mind of readers.His point in reply was that it is very old tik tok video where he made this video to bring change in society as it was in trend most of the youngsters were doing it like that he made to highlight and make it correct but some of his haters tried to manipulate public by showing that old tik tok video and tried to show his image as an anti Hindu. 2409:4089:809E:5F79:0:0:633:48A5 (talk) 02:24, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I have done it Columbidae5 (talk) 09:56, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rfc

The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Wrong forum. No prejudice against opening an AFD discussion. Please read guidance on RFCs next time. — HTGS (talk) 23:42, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on the notability of the subject in this BLP article. Leoneix _(talk) 15:50, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This RFC is unnecessary. If anyone thinks this person is not notable, they should open an WP:AFD discussion explaining why. Iffy★Chat -- 18:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RfC should be procedurally closed. Take it to AfD if you think the subject of this BLP is not notable enough for a Wikipedia article. This is not what RfCs are intended for, which is generally for specific content disputes/issues. Isaidnoway (talk) 🍁 19:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Needs to be procedurally closed. Per above, if notability is questioned it should be brought to AFD. Also, RFC's are used more and more for mundane issues but "editors should try to resolve their issues before starting an RfC". -- Otr500 (talk) 21:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.