Jump to content

Talk:45th Canadian federal election

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PPC in infobox

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


My understanding from discussions on other election pages is that parties are listed in election infoboxes if they hold seats going into the election, or if they hold no seats but earned at least 5% of the popular vote in the previous election. The People's Party have never been elected to a seat and earned just under 5% (4.94% according to our article) in 2021. Should they be included? Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Several iterations of the discussion can be found in the page archives, linked in the box at the top. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 18:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is no rule. However, neutrality in Wikipedia requires articles to provide the same coverage to topics as reliable sources do. (WP:BALASPS). All major media have decided to include the PPC, which is why the article for the last election did and was copied over to this one. If major mainstream media decide to drop the PPC from future summaries, we can consider removing it.-- unsigned comment by TFD (talk)
Agreed, we essentially decided to follow the decision at Talk:2021 Canadian federal election. Since then there have been many discussions that can be found in the archives here. There was also a more recent discussion at Talk:2021 Canadian federal election which then was then closed so that an RfC on the elections and referendums project could proceed. We have decided against strict adherence to the WP:5%R, and to include the PPC here (at least before the 45th election takes place). I don't think anything stops us from reconsidering this once we have results of the next election and know how the PPC have preformed in that contest.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 19:46, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Here's a link to the CBC Federal Election results for 2021.[1] It lists six parties plus "Other." All other major mainstream media did the same thing.
This article lists the six parties because that is what reliable sources did. If they change, then this article should also change.
This article should not give more or less prominence to any party than reliable sources do.
I don't see why some editors want to create a unique standard for this article. Not only is it against policy, but it takes up considerable discussion. TFD (talk) 20:35, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it does. Let's close yet again on this ode to Sisyphus. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 22:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Candidates by riding

[edit]

Since somebody's added it twice...

There's a draft article for that info that's been declared by administrators, repeatedly, as WP:TOOSOON: Draft:Candidates of the 45th Canadian federal election.

A list of candidates by riding doesn't belong in the main election article, ever; the article's long enough without 343 table rows plus numerous region headings. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 15:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. When it is time, the list of candidates should be a sub-article, linked from this article. But likely not until about six months before the election. Maybe even closer than that.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 21:39, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bringing photos in line with each leader's page.

[edit]

Seems reasonable to me, but I'd rather we stick to the policy of getting consensus among the editors before changing leader photos. Trudeau and May are different but the other four match their articles. A bit of cropping would be necessary to match general face size.

Bernier's photo could also do with some cropping to bring his face size in line with the others. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 23:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update about the election.

[edit]

So, CBC news on Sep 15, 2024, CBC News has there can be a chance to trigger a "Carbon Tax"/early election as soon as Fall 2024, because of 2 things, the Conservatives are calling on the other parties to do a "confidence" vote, and most importantly, "The end of the Liberal-NDP governance agreement makes an early election more likely but not inevitable." (From CBC News, Sep 15) Here's more information in this: https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/what-has-to-happen-to-trigger-early-election-1.7321843 JustHistoryLiam (talk) 14:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bloc already announced they won't support a non-confidence motion. I don't know whether such motions go on the page when they're unsuccessful. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 16:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]