Talk:2018 North Carolina's 9th congressional district election

United States: North Carolina / 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

U.S. Congress

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) event(s).

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Politics: American

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

Draft article for a 2019 special election

A special election to fill the vacancy looks incredibly likely, and some candidates have spoken out about whether or not they will run in one. So, I've started a draft article for the race, which I'll move into mainspace if and when a special election is officially called. You can help expand it, at Draft:2019 special election in North Carolina's 9th congressional district. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:30, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Added current event tag. Will also move the draft article live, as it has now been ordered. --Mrfeek (talk) 21:26, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already created: 2019 North Carolina's 9th congressional district special election. Mélencron (talk) 21:28, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cn added - requesting RSS

Cano's endorsement was sourced to the state Libertarian party's website. Needs RSS. Activist (talk) 23:24, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

falsifying witness signatures

Hey, did 'falsifying witness signatures' happen in this election? The NBC article ([1]) says "She also said that Dowless coached her and others as to techniques to not “throw red flags” with the election board, including putting the stamp on the right way, signing witness signatures in the same color ink, and mailing absentee ballots in small numbers." This sentence must mean to say "signing witness signatures in different color ink," unless I am misunderstanding the grammar of the sentence. Further, even if the article meant to say this, then is her coaching sufficient to prove that falsifying witness signatures actually occurred? I would like to see a source that says something like 'She coached them in ballot tampering methodology, and then they actually did it.' I don't want to be too strict on this, but I think we should have a source that has the actual words, "and they actually testified that they really did falsify witness signatures". 03:27, 22 September 2019 (UTC)Geographyinitiative (talk) (modified) There's a big difference between telling someone how to do a crime, and then the crime actually being committed. Of course those two events often occur in proximity, but the actual crime needs to be specifically sourced IMO. Geographyinitiative (talk) 03:33, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Updates?

I have tried to find out what happened to the court cases for Dowless and the others, but it appears Dowless was never tried on charges directly related to the election before his death, and the others??? Maybe their charges are still pending? Or were they dropped when Dowless died? Can any locals figure out what happened?Brianyoumans (talk) 00:31, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]