File talk:Kyoto36-2005.png

What is "piszant" that's seen among the countries below the horizontan axis?

What is being "changed"? Co2 emissions? and i don't get the whole positive change and negative change? Why would a country pledge to gain emissions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.104.225.162 (talk) 05:32, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

reality check

How can you have greater than 100% reduction in emissions, THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE!!

My guess is that they are actually selling carbon credits. For example the baltic states produce way more nuclear power than they need, thus enabling, let's say Germany, to reduce its emissions even further. I do agree that the graph is poorly done, and possibly misleading. In needs a better explanation of what these figures mean. Denizkural (talk) 17:40, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, it is the accumulated, arithmetical addition of the percent change from one year to the next, but the title is still misleading. So either nonsensical, or totally wrong data; which is it? 96.26.192.159 (talk) 23:55, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are these countries purchasing carbon credits? Maybe they replaced their factories and power plants with trees and other carbon sinks? The data is correct: http://unfccc.int/ghg_data/ghg_data_unfccc/items/4146.php. --Dpaulat (talk) 14:04, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

       A brief essay on the importance of Phytoplankton in rescuing society from further degradation, how it is linked to the malfunction of haemoglobin in a atmosphere where there is substantial difference between the co2 part per million counts found in ice cores from when we were thriving and how we are today. I mean not being able to shed carbon dioxide because of the law of diffusion and osmosis, so what happens when we reach a point at which the atmospheric concentration of co2 is so high the body fails to release it at all ? No more humans ?  
       For instance if you are trying to run a business and your respiratory system is struggling to function in a high co2 atmosphere you would be disadvantaged compared with the same situation in a low co2 atmosphere (because you would feel more tired) Hence the link between co2 and national debt the way to prove this is to overlap two graphs of the rising co2 levels over time and the decline in the economies of the world with low natural resources such as oil or cheap labor, the graphs seem to show a disturbing pattern.

it will not allow the graphs to upload. please email timothyread1@hotmail.co.uk for full document

       Action must be taken to ensure that at the very least people can function better and have more energy plus potentially avoiding a serious state of affairs for every one. This is why Phytoplankton and other co2 converting plants have to be somehow farmed on a massive international scale to combat the imminent danger. We obviously cannot and will not stop burning fuel so countries should all pay in to a fund for this necessary undertaking, dependent on their individual co2 footprint. I am not in any sort of position to be able to investigate properly the validity of these findings please give me your thoughts. Further more this could easily be put to the test by getting people to sit in rooms of varying co2 levels and asking them to do a physical and I.Q test, then comparing the mean average test results to see whether this can provide further proof or not.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

“In the absence of oxygen, unbound heamoglobin molecules have a greater chance of becoming carbaminohemoglobin. This is known as the Haldane Effect. The veins, which carry deoxygenated blood back to the right atrium of the heart appear bluish due to the distinctive blue color of carbaminohemoglobin The Haldane effect is a property of hemoglobin first described by the Scottish physician John Scott Haldane. Deoxygenation of the blood increases its ability to carry carbon dioxide; this property is the Haldane effect. Conversely, oxygenated blood has a reduced capacity for carbon dioxide.”

So maybe we can forget about how much co2 there is and enrich earths atmosphere with oxygen as according to this “Haldane effect” the haemoglobin would take on more oxygen, better for us.

Could events in Libya could be linked to the high co2 levels ? Bletchley park allowed us to make sense of all the information to win the war with the Hitler now the issue is to win the war on co2, I fear with out a Bletchley park for co2 we may loose a war that no one will survive. Although a serious investment is needed to realise this. What would society be like in a perfect atmosphere ? More profitable I predict. Tim Read 2011